‘Kids Online Safety Act’ Could Usher in Digital ID for Everyone

February 25, 2026

Once again, under the auspice of ‘protection,’ tyranny crouches ready to pounce….

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/40-attorneys-general-urge-congress-tie-online-access-to-id

40 Attorneys General Urge Congress to ‘Tie Online Access to ID’

If passed, the Kids Online Safety Act could ultimately tie a person’s ability to access the internet to providing digital proof of their identity, according to privacy and free speech watchdog group Reclaim The Net.

by Suzanne Burdick, Ph.D.
February 20, 2026
computer with wifi signal

By Suzanne Burdick, Ph.D. 

Forty state attorneys general (AGs) last week urged federal lawmakers to pass a bill that could ultimately require people to digitally verify their identity to access the internet, according to privacy and free speech watchdog group Reclaim The Net.

In a Feb. 10 letter, the AGs backed the U.S. Senate version of the Kids Online Safety Act. They did not support the U.S. House of Representatives version, which differs in key ways.

If passed, the Senate bill would require government officials and agencies to figure out how computers, cellphones and operating systems could verify people’s age. The bill states:

“The Secretary of Commerce, in coordination with the Federal Communications Commission and the Federal Trade Commission, shall conduct a study evaluating the most technologically feasible methods and options for developing systems to verify age at the device or operating system level.”

The federal officials and agencies would be required to submit a report of their findings to Congress within a year.

Designing cellphones and computer operating systems to verify a user’s age would bring the U.S. another step closer to cementing a digital ID system, Reclaim The Net reported. In an article titled “40 State Attorneys General Want To Tie Online Access to ID,” it wrote:

“Device-level verification would likely depend on digital identity checks tied to government-issued identification, third-party age verification vendors, or persistent account authentication systems. …

“… Once age checks are embedded at the operating system level, the boundary between verifying age and verifying identity becomes difficult to maintain.”

Greg Glaser, a digital privacy expert and attorney, agreed. “By embedding identity checks into apps, hardware, or operating systems, the bill would create a de facto digital ID checkpoint for broad internet use,” he said.  (See link for article)

______________

For more:

Make no mistake, globalists are getting tired of the delays. They desperately want us all bagged and tagged and will dupe as many as they can long the way to achieve this ultimate end game.  This is why legislation like the SAVE Act (making US citizens out of everyone born in the U.S. including children of Islamists and CCP males who breach our borders), Real ID (specialized digitized photograph linked to actual international standards that come out of the UN) and now the Kids Online Safety Act keep popping up.

If these AGs care so much about children, why haven’t the clot shots been recalled and why hasn’t anything been done to protect their bodies from radiation exposure that wireless devices emit?

 

Category:

Activism

Comments Off on ‘Kids Online Safety Act’ Could Usher in Digital ID for Everyone

ACTION: COVID Justice Resolution

https://covidjustice.org/

COVID Justice Resolution

For years, Americans have waited for an honest reckoning with the COVID-19 response—one grounded in reality rather than excuses or institutional gaslighting. Instead, the nation endured the most sweeping suspension of civil liberties in modern history, driven by emergency powers that often lacked evidence, silenced dissent, and inflicted lasting harm, especially on children, small businesses, the elderly, and the working class.

This proposed Senate resolution is a first step toward clarity.

Developed by collaborators associated with organizations including Autism Action Network, Children’s Health Defense, Health Freedom Defense Fund, Stand For Health Freedom, and The Brownstone Institute, it formally repudiates the most destructive COVID-era policies and establishes binding principles to ensure they are never repeated.

This resolution does not assign blame. It does not trade in fear. It reasserts constitutional limits. It stands as notice to the future: emergency powers must never again override liberty, evidence, or human dignity.

Read the resolution. Remember what happened. Ensure it never happens again.

The COVID Justice Resolution

To affirm the permanent lessons of the COVID-19 response, to repudiate certain emergency measures as incompatible with constitutional liberty, and to establish binding principles for any future public-health emergency.

Whereas the COVID-19 pandemic of 2020–2023 occasioned the most widespread and prolonged suspension of civil liberties in American history;

Whereas many measures taken in the name of public health, at both the federal level and most states, lacked sufficient evidence of efficacy, in some cases were arbitrary, imposed disproportionate harm on the poor and working classes, and violated foundational principles of limited government;

Whereas the Senate now judges, with the benefit of hindsight and exhaustive subsequent reflection, that certain categories of intervention must never be repeated;

Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That the Senate—…..(See top link for entire Resolution)

For more:

Category:

Activism, Treatment, vaccines, Viruses

Comments Off on ACTION: COVID Justice Resolution

Help Make “The Rash” By Walter Kirn

Not to be confused with the EM rash sometimes present with Lyme disease…..

https://brownstone.org/articles/help-make-the-rash-by-walter-kirn/

Help Make “The Rash” by Walter Kirn

By    January 29, 2026 
Player Image

There are two possible ways history will treat the Covid era.

The establishment preference is for a story of a killer pathogen that leapt from the animal kingdom into humans to create a deadly pandemic that was fixed by an innovative vaccine. This is the preferred line in shrunken form, one already told in countless books and articles. This is how regime historians – cowards who stood by and watched while people were treated like lab rats – want to tell the story.

The real version of events is far more complicated. It is a story of dangerous scientific experiments mixed with misleading propaganda, mass psychosis, and outright lies, and given forward motion by profiteering pharmaceutical companies, censorial media, government grift, opportunistic bureaucrats, and agency malfeasance.

It is also a story of great heroes who stood up and said no.

Who will tell the real story in a way that can cut through the static?

Many documentaries already exist to get the truth out, but much more is needed. What we need is a narrative, a metaphorical telling, a quasi-historical fiction that puts all the absurdity on display in a slightly changed framework. Ideally, this story would exist in its most compelling form as a satirical film. 

The master of this genre is literary critic, author, and screenwriter Walter Kirn, a living treasure of cultural commentary. He was educated at Princeton University and Oxford University, he achieved literary success with novels such as Thumbsucker (1999), adapted into a 2005 film, and Up in the Air (2001), which was adapted into a 2009 film nominated for six Academy Awards including Best Picture.

His 2014 memoir Blood Will Out chronicles a decade-long friendship with Christian Gerhartsreiter, an impostor who posed as Clark Rockefeller and was later convicted of murder. (See link for article and more on The Rash)

Category:

Activism, research, vaccines, Viruses

Comments Off on Help Make “The Rash” By Walter Kirn

Can Cochrane’s New CEO Save the Sinking Ship?

https://brownstone.org/articles/can-cochranes-new-ceo-save-the-sinking-ship/

Can Cochrane’s New CEO Save the Sinking Ship?

By    February 22, 2026 
Player Image

Article Excerpts:

The Cochrane Collaboration is a grassroots organisation founded in 1993. It publishes systematic reviews of healthcare interventions and was highly successful until British journalist Mark Wilson became CEO in 2012. A major medical journal expressed concern that someone with no health care experience was leading one of the foremost organisations dedicated to ensuring good clinical decisions.1 Wilson made the organisation highly ineffective and bureaucratic, and his actions harmed Cochrane’s mission about ensuring high scientific standards.2-4

The problems mounted, and in April 2021, Wilson suddenly left his job, a week before Cochrane’s largest funder, the National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) in the UK, announced a major budget cut.5 The funder criticised the poor scientific quality of Cochrane reviews, “a point raised by people in the Collaboration to ensure that garbage does not go into the reviews; otherwise, your reviews will be garbage.”2 Only four months later, the NIHR declared that the funding would stop in March 2023. When that happened, Cochrane was in big disarray, but the huge bureaucracy and the poor scientific standard continued nonetheless.2

I shall discuss 11 cases that stem from my personal experiences and those of Tom Jefferson, one of my previous employees, starting in 2015 when Soares-Weiser became Deputy Editor-in-Chief and got a substantial say about the standard of Cochrane reviews (she became Editor-in-Chief in 2019).12 But first, I shall describe a stunning affair in 2013. (See link for article)

_____________

**Comment**

I highly recommend listening to Gøtzsche’s Survival of a Whistleblower to understand what is at stake for speaking out about industry corruption and conflicts of interest.  Gøtzsche certainly has paid the price as have many others throughout history.  We are indebted to those who uphold ethics in a time when it’s always easier to follow the crowd.

As a founding member, Gøtzsche was expelled from the Cochrane group he helped create. Four board members promptly resigned in protest.  He states that within the group, academic freedom has gone, scientific debates are unwelcome, and transparency is a thing of the past. 

The reason for the expulsion?

He challenged the leadership on core issues and on the way it was managing the charity.

He warned that flu ‘vaccine’ research is corrupted.  He also took issue with HPV research charging it may have overlooked side effects.

Proving without a shadow of doubt: it is verboten to question anything about ‘vaccines.’

Gøtzsche is widely known for his fierce attacks on Big Pharma and his criticism of medical interventions he deems useless or harmful. He wrote a controversial book about what he says is the overuse of mammography in breast cancer screening, and in another book likened Pharma to “organized crime.”

This man steps on ALL the toes of the beast.

In short, he states that if Cochrane can not find an ethical CEO, it illustrates how far the organization has sunk morally and scientifically.

“In science, there can be no compromises when these loyalties clash, even if members of the club may feel you don’t respect them or their authority.” ~ Dr. Peter Gøtzsche

 

 

Category:

Activism, research

Comments Off on Can Cochrane’s New CEO Save the Sinking Ship?

Do I Need IV Antibiotics?

February 23, 2026

https://danielcameronmd.com/iv-antibiotics/

Do I Need IV Antibiotics?
Dec22

Do I Need IV Antibiotics?

Posted By: Dr. Daniel Cameron

He Asked What Many Eventually Ask

He sat across from me and voiced something countless patients eventually reach: Doctor… do I need IV antibiotics?

The patient struggled with cognitive slowing, neuropathic pain, persistent headaches, sleep disruption, and mild dizziness. He was improving slowly with oral antibiotics — but anxious he was missing something.

He had seen images of patients with IV poles on social media and heard stories of recovery only after patients had been treated with IV antibiotics. He believed IV therapy represented the “real treatment.” He wasn’t alone. Many assume IV antibiotics are stronger, faster, or required.

What IV Antibiotics Can (and Can’t) Do in Recovery

IV antibiotics can help in some cases of Lyme disease, especially when there is significant neurological involvement and oral treatments haven’t brought noticeable improvement or symptoms keep getting worse.

However, IV therapy is not simply a stronger version of oral treatment. It carries catheter-related risks, varies in what it covers, and does not guarantee better outcomes. For some patients, it offers benefit; for others, progress occurs through different strategies. IV is a tool — not a universal upgrade.

Why Some Patients Don’t Improve Even After IV Therapy

Many patients aren’t aware that the most commonly used IV antibiotic for Lyme — ceftriaxone — doesn’t treat co-infections like Babesia, Bartonella, or Anaplasma.

If one of these infections is present, IV therapy alone may not help, even when it’s given correctly.

In many cases, it’s a mismatch in coverage, not a lack of effort, that explains why some people don’t get better after IV treatment.

How I Decide When IV Antibiotics Makes Sense

Many antibiotics offered in IV form — including doxycycline and azithromycin — exist orally with good tissue penetration and far fewer catheter-related risks.

Other IV antibiotics are still being studied, so I usually use them only in specific situations rather than as a first step or automatic next step.

Even when IV therapy is appropriate, drug selection matters. Ceftriaxone, for example, can affect the gallbladder, so in patients with prior concern, cefotaxime (Claforan) may be an alternative — though it requires far more frequent dosing.

The Turning Point Was Not IV — It Was Correct Treatment

Because Babesia was clinically suspected, we adjusted the patient’s oral regimen to include azithromycin (Zithromax) and Malarone.

His cognition sharpened. Neuropathy eased. Headaches settled. Sleep stabilized. Dizziness quieted.

A few weeks later he said, “I thought IV was my only shot. I didn’t realize I could get better without it.”

He never required IV treatment — he needed the right treatment, not a different route.

Sometimes progress isn’t escalation — it’s correction.

“Do I Need IV Antibiotics?”

When someone asks, “Do I need IV antibiotics?” the answer depends on symptoms, function, and treatment response.

There are situations where IV therapy is justified. But many improve when treatment is refined, not intensified.

If improvement stalls despite appropriate care — or neurological involvement is suspected — IV therapy may be considered.

But many regain ground when treatment targets co-infections and physiologic drivers.

If you have wondered whether you truly needed IV antibiotics, you are not alone. Share your experience below — someone else may feel less alone reading it.
Resources
  1. Columbia University. Lyme and Tick-Borne Diseases Research Center.
  2. CDC. Chronic Symptoms and Lyme Disease.
  3. Johns Hopkins Lyme Disease Research Center.
  4. Dr. Daniel Cameron: Lyme Science Blog. What Is the Best Treatment for Lyme Disease?
  5. Dr. Daniel Cameron: Lyme Science Blog. Lyme disease: One size does not fit all

**Comment**

I’m sure at some point every single patient asks this question. The sad truth about this complex illness is that it takes savvy, experience, and a whole lot of patience. It also typically takes more than one brain working on it and the challenge is being able to decipher what to use, when, and how much.

If ever there was an illness that is completely individualized, this is it!

It can also take YEARS to treat and this is really hard to wrap your mind around at first.  It took FIVE YEARS of highly individualized, expensive, and painful treatment for both my husband and me.  Painful due to the herxheimer reactions treatment causes and individualized because of the many coinfections that are often involved.

It’s also the reason why RCTs are futile, a waste of money, and why we desperately need N of 1 trials to be respected and accepted.

For more:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Category:

Activism, Lyme, Treatment

Comments Off on Do I Need IV Antibiotics?