Trump Orders EPA Framework to ‘Release Into the Environment’ Modified, Bacteria-Based Mosquito and Tick Technologies Without Informed Consent
New executive order involves what it calls “genetic modification” and “beneficial bacteria,” without identifying what will actually be released and without informed consent from citizens.
President Donald Trump ordered the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to create a regulatory framework for the “planned development and release into the environment” of mosquito- and tick-control technologies, according to a September 29 executive order published by the White House.
The executive order says that framework must consider “sterilization techniques, safe genetic modification, and use of safe, beneficial bacteria.”
Where is the informed consent?
What exactly will be released?
What has been modified?
Which bacteria will be used?
What else will the resulting products contain or carry?
How far can they travel?
Who monitors unintended exposure?
Who is liable if something goes wrong?
And how does an American who does not consent keep a released organism off their body and off their property?
The executive order does not say.
I do not consent.
(See link for article)
________________
**Comment**
Here we go again.
A lot of our taxes are flying out the door with such projects, including $125 Million to scale automated RNA-LNP factories with one-day lot release despite unknown endotoxin levels. Using tax payer dollars to fund dangerous technologies is not new. PARC, a Silicon Valley R&D lab best known for pioneering Ethernet and laser printing, was funded by the U.S. government to create an automatic biological spray technique. Then, it started the DEFUSE project a year before the COVID ‘pandemic’ that characterized a pandemic response to a future SARS-CoV-2-like outbreak.
In DEFUSE, PARC described its technology as capable of “large area and high throughput aerosol delivery” of fluids including “bioactive formulations,” and identified “large area inoculation of animals/humans with bioengineered formulations” as a potential application.Source
The catch is, we don’t know what was sprayed, where, or who was exposed.
I spent five years researching Bitten, my book about the U.S. military’s Cold War bug-borne weapons program and the unresolved questions surrounding the first investigation into Lyme disease.
At the center of the story is Willy Burgdorfer, the NIH scientist celebrated for identifying the bacterium that causes Lyme disease. Before the book came out, few people knew that Burgdorfer also spent part of his career working with Fort Detrick’s entomological warfare division. Researchers there studied how fleas, mosquitoes, and ticks could be infected with pathogens and used as weapons.
Late in life, Burgdorfer told me he had found a second unusual microbe during the Lyme investigation—one he believed deserved far more scrutiny. He suggested it may have been connected to earlier weapons research and said he had been ordered to set it aside. Letters and laboratory notes I later found supported that account.
To be clear, Bitten did not prove that Lyme disease was a bioweapon. It asked a narrower and more urgent question: whether another potentially disease-causing microbe found in Lyme-area ticks and humans had been ignored, hidden, or never fully investigated.
That distinction matters. When Rep. Chris Smith (R-NJ) called for a congressional inquiry in 2019 into whether the military had used ticks in biological-weapons research, the public deserved a careful examination of the records. Instead, the debate was quickly reframed around a claim I never made.
I saw this as a classic disinformation move—reframe the argument to include something false, then attribute it to the reporter and brand the person as a conspiracy theorist. Casual readers never get past the headline and a false narrative is burned into memory.
The stakes are not academic. The release of engineered or unnatural biological agents can have long-term effects on people and the environment. Continued secrecy around the tick-borne weapons program still obstructs a timely response to a growing public-health crisis.
A conversation with the author
I called Telford after reading the piece to discuss statements I considered false or misleading. When I asked whether he had read Bitten, he said, “No. I don’t have time to read books.” I offered to send him a copy. “You can, but I’ll probably shred it,” he replied. That exchange stayed with me: an op-ed designed to dismiss my book was written by someone who told me he had not read it.
(See link for article)
_________________
**Comment**
Sadly, we go onto learn that publications would not fact-check the errors in Telford’s op-ed.
Newby kept digging and points out that Telford, a tick researcher at Tufts University didn’t disclose that he was the director of Tuft’s New England Regional Biosafety Laboratory, located in a semi-rural New England town about 40 miles west of Boston. This biolevel-3 lab works on biodefense, dangerous pathogens, and high-containment laboratory operations, including anthrax and tick-borne diseases.
COVID exposed a much bigger reason for the lack of disclosure.
The ‘powers that be’ do not want the eye of Mordor swinging onto tick weaponization because it would draw attention to dangerous work at the Rocky Mountain Laboratories, including the importing of foreign pathogens exposed a couple of months ago in the Munster affair, described here and here, not to mention the fact everyone’s dog knows now that COVID was created in a lab and either escaped or was intentionally released.
The questions raised decades ago continue to remain unresolved thanks to Telford and others’ deflection.
President Trump announced on Sept. 18, 2026 that his administration plans to recommend that certain childhood vaccines be split up into separate shots. The policy proposal is apparently a follow-up to an Executive Order the President signed on Aug. 10 that calls for recommending the number of diseases for which children should be vaccinated be reduced from 17 to 11, including measles, mumps, rubella, diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, polio, Haemophilus influenzae type B, pneumococcal disease, human papillomavirus, and varicella.123 Trump said:
Instead of a child going in and having a tremendous amount of different vaccines pumped into a big proportion of the body … we’re going to recommend that they do five doses marked one, two, three, four, five and that they be given in six-month intervals, so that a small amount of the vaccine gets pumped into the body.12
MMR Could Be First to Be Targeted
A likely combination vaccine that could be separated into individual shots would be the live attenuated MMR vaccine, a three and four-vaccine combo shot in the form of the MMR (measles, mumps, and rubella) and MMRV (measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella) vaccines.
Last month’s Executive Order actually specified that the MMR vaccine be broken up and be administered as separate shots. The MMR, either Merck’s M-M-R II product or GSK’s Priorix, are recommended for children 12-15 months old (first dose) and 4-6 years old (second dose). Breaking up the vaccine would mean giving three shots (one each for measles, mumps, and rubella) instead of one combo shot for the first dose and three shots again instead of the combination MMR shot for the second dose.34
There is another combo shot on the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) childhood vaccination schedule—the DTaP (diphtheria, tetanus, and acellular pertussis). There are two DTaP combo vaccines licensed in the United States—Sanofi Pasteur’s Daptacel and GSK’s Infanrix. The DTaP shot is recommended to be given five times. The first shot at two months of age, the second at four months, the third at six months, the fourth between 15 and18 months, and the fifth between 4 and 6 years. Breaking up the vaccine would mean, again, giving three shots (one each for diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis) instead of one combo shot for each of the five doses.5678
There are five other combo vaccines licensed in the U.S. that include the DTaP—Kinrix, Quadracel, Pediarix, Pentacel, and Vaxelis. GSK’s Kinrix and Sanofi Pasteur’s Quadracel each add the inactivated poliovirus vaccine to make them four-vaccine combos. GSK’s Pediarix adds the hepatitis B and inactivated poliovirus vaccines, making it a five-vaccine combo. Sanofi Pasteur’s Pentacel adds the inactivated poliovirus and Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccines for another five-vaccine combo. Lastly, Merck/Sanofi Pasteur’s Vaxelis adds the inactivated poliovirus, hepatitis B, and Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccines for a whopping six-vaccine combo.9
There is also the Tdap (tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis) vaccine), and one dose is recommended for children between 11-12 years old.10
Safety of Combo Vaccines a Concern
Combination vaccines, particularly the combination diptheria-tetanus-pertussis and measles-mumps-rubella vaccines have been used for decades since the mid-20th century. If vaccine manufacturers agree to produce separate vaccines and the CDC officially recommends their use, this policy shift would represent a major reversal in the growing trend toward the development of more and more combo shots containing multiple vaccines.
An article by guest writer Sheri Marino republished in The Vaccine Reaction noted, “While the CDC suggests that combination vaccines are safe, research shows there are more adverse events, such as febrile seizures, with combination vaccines than there are for single vaccines.” Marino added, “Research published in the New England Journal of Medicine revealed a significantly elevated risk of febrile seizures 8 to 14 days after administration of the MMR vaccine.”11
Marino continued:
According to the CDC, pre-licensing data obtained from the Vaccine Safety Datalink, reveals the MMRV vaccine shows recipients were twice as likely to have febrile seizures than those injected with the MMR and Varicella vaccines separately. Another study conducted in Denmark published in the Journal of American Medical Association demonstrated that the 5 valent DTaP-IPV-HIB vaccine has been linked with increased febrile seizures.11
https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/11/10/flu-vaccine-education/ Four scientists researching the Flu vaccine during the 1960s found it to be ineffective and refused to give it to their own families. The scientists state they were prevented from publishing their negative findings. Now a recent Japanese study shows NO BENEFIT on hard outcomes: hospitalization and death.
COVID Hospital Protocols: ‘This Kind of Cruelty Will Not Be Repeated’
Witnesses at Sen. Ron Johnson’s roundtable today described patients separated from loved ones, treatment decisions made without family consent and medical professionals who said they faced pressure when they challenged hospital protocols. “Today I am providing a platform for these stories to be told so that this kind of cruelty will not be repeated,” Johnson said.
During Sen. Ron Johnson’s (R-Wis.) roundtable on COVID-19 hospital care today, Brad Seiler described the desperate effort to get his wife, Gail, out of a hospital after staff told him she was “unsavable.”
When Brad finally got her discharged, he said hospital staff wouldn’t let them leave through the main entrance. Instead, Gail was taken down a freight elevator used to transport bodies to the morgue and escorted out through doors used by funeral homes.
A nurse told him, “She’ll be dead tonight, or before you even get home.” Gail survived.
“Today, Gail is alive, healthy, active, and enjoying life with our grandchildren and children,” Seiler said.
Seiler was one of 21 patients, family members, doctors and nurses who testified at the “COVID-19 Hospital Protocols: Real Stories from Real People” roundtable. Johnson said that as of Sept. 26, his office had received 583 testimonies from people in 46 states.
“Today I am providing a platform for these stories to be told so that this kind of cruelty will not be repeated,” Johnson said.
BREAKING: Dr. James Miller EXPOSES the Hospital Protocol Murder Machine and the Plan to Eliminate the Rights of the Unvaccinated
Testifying before Senator Ron Johnson, a trauma surgeon blows the whistle on falsified death counts, deadly protocols, and the state-backed plot to restrict the civil rights of the unvaccinated people
Dr. James P. Miller, a trauma and ICU surgeon, conducted formal quality reviews that exposed rampant administrative fraud directly responsible for patient harm and skyrocketing mortality.
Senior hospital executives deliberately pushed toxic protocols like Remdesivir using false and misleading data, locking patients into lethal treatment tracks while silencing frontline dissent.
While corporate media broadcast images of overflowing wards, the lived reality inside the hospital was empty beds and nurses sent home for lack of work. Trauma and other non-COVID fatalities were systematically falsified on death certificates as COVID-19 to inflate the casualty count and terrorize the public.
The hospital head of infectious diseases openly admitted to Dr. Miller that leadership was coordinating directly with state officials to strip unvaccinated citizens of their basic civil rights, culminating in an outright institutional refusal to treat unvaccinated patients.
“The head of infectious disease medicine at my hospital privately told me that he was working with the state government to restrict the civil rights of unvaccinated people.” — Dr. James P. Miller, MD
(See link for article and video testimony)
________________
**Comment**
It’s important to note and appreciate that due to the medical tyranny Dr. Miller opened a free clinic through his church where he successfully treated many Covid patients with zinc, quercetin, ivermectin, and HCQ. For saving lives he was rewarded with having to endure YEARS of disciplinary and legal action, with the goal of taking away his medical license. He was one of the few doctors who spoke the truth when most of his colleagues remained silent.
I just learned that attorney Ralph Lorigo spoke at the Roundtable and stated that he represented 212 legal cases. In 72 cases, he successfully got Ivermectin administered to the patient. Of those 72 patients, he said only 3 died—a 95.8% survival rate. He won additional cases in which ivermectin ultimately was not administered despite the court action. Of the remaining 140 cases that could not get into court quickly enough or lost his effort to obtain the treatment, he testified that every single patient died.
According to retired New York University Professor of media studies Mark Crispin Miller, COVID was a ‘propaganda masterpiece.’
In January of 2026, we learned through FOIA records that U.S. federal intelligence agencies classified and redacted the results of an internal review of COVID-19 PCR test primers, even as those tests were used to define “cases,” drive emergency policy, and justify unprecedented social and economic controls.
Folks have been screaming about the inaccuracy of using PCR, which can’t distinguish between a virus and death, harmless viral fragments, for years. In fact, one study found only 14% of PCR “COVID cases” were real, proving that lockdowns, masking, ‘vaccine’ mandates, were all built upon a fraudulent testing illusion. Italy reduced it’s COVID death number by 97% due to the high cycle threshold values utilized that led to soaring false positives. A Portuguese court ruled that PCR tests are unreliable and unlawful to quarantine people based solely upon them. A study determined way back in 2020 that the false positive rate using PCR for COVID is 97%.
It’s always about a lucrative ‘magic bullet’ vaccine that never lives up to the hype, and has been proven to contain 55 undeclared chemical elements, Green monkey DNA, metals including graphene, PEG, lipid nanoparticles, black particles, white floating and other foreign matter, human fetal cell lines, and dangerous endotoxins hidden from testing. U.S. officials knew the injection safety system was flawed but ignored warnings.
Then, public health ‘authorities’ grossly inflated COVID mortality. A 2025 update showed nearly half of COVID deaths were not due to COVID. Countless patients and advocates have spoken out on the unbelievable injustice they were forced to endure due to the unconstitutional and fraudulent measures imposed upon them, which sometimes resulted in their untimely death.
As a result of all these findings, Senator Johnson connected with Canadian MP Chris Lewis to discussed alleged COVID-19 vaccine side effects and “turbo cancer” claims at the Allison Inquiry in Canada, and the IMA is calling on the CDC to immediately withdraw ‘off label’ COVID ‘vaccine’ recommendations.
• DMSO is an inexpensive “umbrella remedy” whose combination of therapeutic properties (e.g., restoring circulation, reducing inflammation, and reactivating dormant cells) makes it uniquely suited to treating neurological disorders that otherwise lack effective options.
• Hundreds of studies and many reader reports show DMSO can dramatically improve strokes, brain bleeds, traumatic brain injuries, and spinal cord injuries (including permanent paralysis), with the best results occurring when it is given soon after the injury.
• Extensive data supports DMSO for neurodegenerative diseases such as Parkinson’s, Alzheimer’s, ALS, MS, and prion disease, along with cognitive impairment, psychiatric disorders, chronic stress, seizures, and Down syndrome.
• DMSO is one of the most effective treatments available for pain (e.g., neuropathic pain, spinal pain, headaches, and fibromyalgia) and peripheral nerve damage, and since the eyes and ears are also extensions of the nervous system, it frequently improves vision, hearing, and tinnitus.
• DMSO’s ability to treat so many seemingly unrelated neurological conditions suggests they share root causes conventional neurology does not recognize, which is a major reason so many of these diseases remain untreated.
• This article condenses a four-part DMSO neurology series (covering approximately 4,500 studies and 1,000 reader reports) into an accessible summary and concludes with practical guidance on sourcing, dosing, and condition-specific protocols.
Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) is a simple, inexpensive compound found throughout nature whose remarkable properties allow it both to treat a wide range of illnesses and to facilitate the use of many different (FDA approved) medical therapies. Yet, it exists in a strange limbo: it is one of the most extensively studied and used medicinal compounds, but most mainstream sources insist there’s no evidence it works for anything beyond its single FDA-approved use, interstitial cystitis, despite the fact that physicians and scientists, seeing its promise, independently conducted tens of thousands of studies demonstrating its therapeutic utility and that DMSO, on the basis of that data, is widely used in foreign medical systems.
DMSO’s peculiar status results from the fact it cannot be profited off of (e.g., a twenty dollar bottle will last a user for months). Because of this, there has been no incentive within the medical field to secure a costly approval for it within the FDA’s “pay-to-play system.” Rather, the FDA went to war against DMSO for decades (despite immense public protest to legalize DMSO) and as a result, almost all of the approved DMSO preparations on the market are DMSO pharmaceutical combinations (as they can be patented and then marked up). Likewise, there was no incentive within the natural health field to market it as a supplement, which has resulted in it becoming mostly forgotten by the time a 1994 law took away the FDA’s ability to restrict natural supplements like DMSO.
I find this egregious, as DMSO is able to:
Treat a variety of common conditions (e.g., pain and injuries) in a dramatically effective, cheaper, and most importantly safer manner than the existing therapeutic options.
Treat a variety of challenging and tragic illnesses that have few or no treatment options, in many cases producing recoveries so dramatic they are regarded as “miraculous” or “impossible.
