In 2022, I first wrote an article stating there was simply no way spike proteins or even LNPs could be shedding in quantities or concentrations capable of harming unvaccinated people.
Many unvaccinated readers were unhappy with me. They wrote back, clearly frustrated, insisting they were not liars. They had suffered real conditions after interacting with vaccinated people.
So, I decided to look closer. In June 2022, I created a detailed questionnaire and collected responses from 182 unvaccinated people who believed they had experienced shedding-related symptoms. The patterns were striking.
Denying these experiences would have been a mistake. The question was never “are people imagining things?” The real question was, “What is the actual mechanism behind what they are experiencing?”
The story starts inside the principal endocrine glands. In men, the testes have a blood-testis barrier (“BTB”) that can become leaky after vaccination (that most likely explains the drop in sperm count by the way). When that happens, hormones – and possibly increased numbers of immune cells – can escape into the semen. In women, the ovaries have their own blood-ovarian barrier that can allow excess hormones to leak out. The leaks are mostly transient, but can be partly permanent.
These substances can then reach the mucosa – the nose, mouth, and gastrointestinal tract – where they can be aerosolised or exchanged during normal daily contact.
Conclusion
The evidence – both from the survey and from basic biology – points to a clear and coherent mechanism.
Shedding is real. But what is actually being shed in quantities and concentrations capable of producing observable effects is overwhelmingly hormones leaking through damaged blood-tissue barriers, not spike protein or lipid nanoparticles. The low-dilution routes (semen during unprotected sex, breast milk when the blood-milk barrier is compromised) and the cumulative low-level exposure in poorly ventilated indoor spaces explain the patterns we see in the real world far better than any theory of vaccine-particle transmission.
Understanding this mechanism doesn’t mean dismissing people’s experiences – quite the opposite. It means we can look at the reports with clarity instead of fear. It means we can focus on supporting endothelial and barrier health rather than living in panic about “shedders.”
We must not forget to protect the children and their mothers from the harm of these ill-injected vaccines by informing them. (See link for article)
The Turin Court of Appeal has just handed down a verdict that could well shake the foundations of vaccine certainty in Europe.
On May 11, 2026, it confirmed the causal link between the Pfizer-BioNTech Comirnaty Covid-19 vaccine and severe transverse myelitis in a shopkeeper from Piedmont, ordering the Italian Ministry of Health to pay her monthly compensation.
This is not an isolated case: the initial ruling by the Asti Civil Court (October 2025) had already been issued, and the Ministry’s appeal was rejected. This rare legal precedent, based on independent expert opinions, could inspire thousands of victims in France. (See link for article)
COVID forced the public to ask whether a pandemic could come from a lab. Now, years later, Congress is hearing testimony about a COVID lab-leak coverup, and Tulsi Gabbard is reportedly investigating more than 120 U.S.-funded foreign biolabs.
Experts Warn Lab Leaks ‘Surprisingly Common’ After NIH Confirms Possible Exposure to Deadly Virus at Montana Lab
An employee at Rocky Mountain Laboratories in Montana was potentially exposed to Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever following a personal protective equipment breach in November 2025, according to the National Institutes of Health. The incident highlights the lack of a centralized federal system to track all laboratory incidents across agencies and institutions.
This article was originally published by The Defender — Children’s Health Defense’s News & Views Website.
A Rocky Mountain Laboratories employee in Hamilton, Montana, may have been exposed to Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever (CCHF) in November 2025 after an accidental breach of personal protective equipment, according to the National Institutes of Health (NIH).
The incident was reported to NIH in February 2026, according to internal communications referenced in documents shared by White Coat Waste.
NIH officials said the employee did not become infected, and no transmission occurred.
“The employee was immediately isolated and monitored under appropriate care at a specialized medical facility before it was confirmed that no actual exposure or transmission had occurred,” NIH said in a statement. “At no time was there any risk to the public or to other staff.”
What is Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever?
CCHF is a rare but potentially fatal viral disease spread primarily through infected tick bites or contact with the blood and bodily fluids of infected animals or people, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
The disease, which is most common in parts of Africa, Asia, the Middle East and Eastern and Southern Europe, can cause high fever, severe headache, vomiting, internal bleeding and hemorrhaging. The CDC reported that up to 50% of hospitalized patients may die from the illness.
The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations said veterinarians and healthcare workers, and people who work closely with livestock, face an elevated risk of infection, while human-to-human transmission can occur through exposure to contaminated blood, medical equipment or bodily fluids.
There is no approved cure or available vaccine for CCHF, according to the World Health Organization.
Incident occurred at high-containment NIH lab
Rocky Mountain Laboratories, a Biosafety Level 4 (BSL-4) facility operated by NIH, conducts research on high-consequence infectious diseases, including tick-borne and emerging viral pathogens.
The facility is designed to study “confounding health issues, such as coronavirus, influenza, prion diseases, and antibiotic-resistant bacteria.”
It is part of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. It has historically focused on vector-borne and infectious conditions, including Lyme disease, Rocky Mountain spotted fever and other pathogens.
Lab leaks ‘surprisingly common’
Lab leaks involving dangerous pathogens occur more often than widely understood, according to some biosafety researchers.
Richard Ebright, Ph.D., a molecular biologist at Rutgers University in New Brunswick, New Jersey, said lab accidents that result in laboratory-acquired infections or releases are “surprisingly common.”
“The CCHF incident … was just one of an average of five such events that occur every week in the U.S., Canada and the U.K.,” he said.
Dr. William Schaffner, an infectious disease specialist and professor at Vanderbilt University Medical Center in Nashville, Tennessee, said these types of dangers are treated with vigilance.
“When there is a leak there is a response,” he said. “The general track record is an affirmation that this system is working around the world.”
‘Not mandatory’ to report all leaks
Oversight of high-containment biological research laboratories in the U.S., however, remains fragmented, without a centralized federal system to track all laboratory incidents across agencies and institutions.
“There is no national database because it’s not mandatory to report all leaks,” said Alina Chan, Ph.D., a vector and genetic engineering specialist.
However, reporting of accidents, exposures and potential containment breaches in the U.S. has “no federal accounting of incidents” beyond a narrow set of regulated pathogens and “no official registry” for many high-containment laboratories.
Korol’s analysis contrasted the U.S. system with Canada’s centralized Laboratory Incident Notification Canada program, which requires mandatory national reporting of biosafety incidents. She warned that inconsistent documentation and oversight can hinder transparency, risk assessment and coordinated responses to potential lab leaks.
‘Continual improvement’ needed
A 2024 scoping review in The Lancet documented 309 lab-acquired infections involving 51 pathogens and 16 reported accidental pathogen escape incidents between 2000 and 2021.
The authors concluded that “continual improvement” in biosafety management and reporting standards is essential, noting that underreporting and inconsistent oversight likely obscure the true scale of the problem.
Researchers said stronger reporting systems and root-cause investigations are necessary to reduce future incidents and improve laboratory accountability worldwide.
The authors wrote that “the question is not if a pathogen will escape, but rather which pathogen will and what measures are in place to contain an escape with serious consequences.”
Baric Published Traceless Coronavirus Genome Engineering Platform Just Days Before the 2002 SARS-CoV-1 Pandemic Began
NIH-funded project describes how to digitally assemble, manipulate, and reconstruct full coronavirus genomes while removing visible engineering fingerprints from the final sequence.
In November 2002—the same month Chinese officials later said the first SARS cases began appearing in Guangdong Province—a team led by University of North Carolina coronavirologist Ralph Baric published a paper describing a programmable, full-length coronavirus genome assembly system capable of reconstructing coronavirus genomes while removing visible assembly fingerprints from the final construct.
The paper, published November 1, 2002, in the Journal of Virology, was titled “Systematic Assembly of a Full-Length Infectious cDNA of Mouse Hepatitis Virus Strain A59” and described a new reverse-genetics platform for assembling an entire coronavirus genome from modular DNA fragments.
The work was financed by American tax dollars in the form of research grants from the National Institutes of Health (NIH): “AI23946 and GM63228 to R.S.B., AI26603 to M.R.D., and AI17418 to S.R.W.”
The timing raises obvious questions about whether the emergence of sophisticated government-backed coronavirus engineering systems and the beginning of the SARS era were truly independent events.
Important excerpt:
Years later, Baric would outline and patent how to engineer coronaviruses with SARS-CoV-2’s defining traits—a furin cleavage site (PRRA) insertion at the S1/S2 junction, targeted human-optimizing mutations throughout the receptor-binding domain (including the critical Q498 residue), and the two-proline (V1060P/L1061P) substitution to stabilize the spike protein in its prefusion conformation—just months before the COVID-19 pandemic began.
(See link for article)
**Comment**
It’s important to update history when facts become known.
The reason it’s important to link Baric’s paper and work done on SARS is because the work led to COVID. It’s important to emphasize the bit about ‘removing visible assembly fingerprints.’ This simply means it was manipulated purposely to be invisible – a lot like Lyme/MSIDS.
Just to refresh your memory, President Trump declared a national emergency in March 2020, which consolidated power into the executive branch, placing COVID as a military operation and effectively declaring a medical martial law. According to Attorney Todd Callender, all federal legal cases regarding COVID crimes were dismissed because the military was prosecuting a war during a declared national emergency. This can happen again at any time.
An HHS-funded study published this month says that scientists have lab-engineered brand-new reassortant “Frankenstein” bird flu viruses said to carry genetic components from the 2024 dairy cow H5N1 outbreak and a purportedly fatal 2025 Washington H5N5 case, creating pathogens the paper warns may possess enhanced immune-evasion potential in humans.
The study, published in Nature Communications, was conducted by researchers from the University of Pennsylvania, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, and the University of Chicago.
The paper repeatedly warns that the bird flu constructs like the ones these researchers engineered may pose an increased risk to humans because much of the population possesses weak or nonexistent immunity against them.
The experiments align with published gain-of-function definitions involving enhanced immune evasion, altered host range dynamics, and pandemic-preparedness research.
“This project was funded in part with federal funds from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, under contract no. 75N93021C00015 and grant number R01AI08686.”
The disclosure section also states lead author Scott E. Hensley:
“is a co-inventor on patents that describe the use of nucleoside-modified mRNA as a vaccine platform.”
The paper further states Hensley received consulting fees from:
Sanofi
Pfizer
Lumen
Novavax
Merck
(See link for article)
According to investigative journalist Jon Fleetwood, newly released H.R. 8595, which readies $3.35 BILLION for future global health threats, keeps Bill Gates’ ‘vaccine’ syndicate GAVI plugged into the U.S. funding pipeline.
the bill is not merely funding emergency humanitarian aid.
It’s funding the continued buildout of international public health infrastructure capable of coordinating surveillance systems, outbreak-response mechanisms, immunization campaigns, emergency-response networks, and foreign health-crisis operations across multiple nations.
The legislation also explicitly authorizes programs tied to: “disaster preparedness training for health crises” and: “programs to prevent, prepare for, and respond to unanticipated and emerging global health threats.”
Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has invoked the controversial PREP Act to shield FUJIFILM Toyama Chemical from legal liability for favipiravir (Avigan), an antiviral drug that is not approved for hantavirus treatment in any country and has never received FDA approval in the United States.
The declaration, signed May 22, 2026, provides broad liability protection to the Japanese manufacturer, distributors, and healthcare providers using the drug on people said to have been exposed during the MV Hondius cruise ship outbreak and their close contacts.
This PREP Act declaration, in effect through July 18, 2026, limits lawsuits for injuries or deaths caused by the drug.
The move raises major health freedom concerns involving informed consent, bodily autonomy, pharmaceutical liability shielding, experimental countermeasure deployment during a publicized outbreak event, and the use of emergency powers to protect manufacturers and administrators from accountability if Americans are injured or killed by the drug.
You can contact HHS here to voice opposition to the use of emergency powers to shield experimental hantavirus countermeasures and pharmaceutical manufacturers from legal liability. (See link for article)
Important Excerpts:
According to the official Japanese regulatory documents from the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA), preclinical animal studies have shown that favipiravir has the risk of teratogenicity and reproductive toxicity in experimental animals, including findings indicative of birth defects in mice, rats, rabbits, and monkeys, along with decreases in live fetal body weight and in the number of live fetuses.
The official Japanese product label for favipiravir warns that the drug can cause serious hepatic dysfunction and jaundice, including clinically significant elevations in liver enzymes (AST/GOT, ALT/GPT, γ-GTP), which may progress to life-threatening liver injury.
A July 2025 Pathogens publication confirms the U.S. military funded experiments aerosolizing hantavirus pathogens (making them airborne) with a 30% fatality rate.
Less than a year after the publication, the Andes hantavirus cruise ship outbreak would be declared.
Moreover, NIAID’s $70 million PROVIDENT program actively funded and operated a large-scale hantavirus preparedness initiative that engineered vaccine platforms, mapped Andes hantavirus structures in unprecedented detail, developed rapid-response countermeasure systems, and prioritized hantaviruses as future pandemic targets in the run-up to the 2026 international Andes hantavirus outbreak.
The Andes hantavirus genome was built from human blood at the infamous U.S. military biolab Fort Detrick.
Comments Off on Experts Warn Lab Leaks ‘Surprisingly Common’ After NIH Confirms Possible Exposure to Deadly Virus at Montana Lab, Tax Dollars Continue to Fund ‘Gain of Function’ While RFK Jr. Invokes PREP Act For Hantavirus
In the mid-1970s, a cluster of unexplained illnesses appeared in a small town in Connecticut. It would later be called Lyme disease. But how was the investigation handled? What questions were closed? And what records still remain unseen? This 32-minute investigative documentary examines the early history of Lyme disease, the institutional response, and the broader issue of transparency in public health decision-making.
This is not about assigning blame. This is not about promoting a predetermined theory.
It is about one principle: If federal records exist regarding Lyme’s early history, the public deserves to see them. The MAHA movement has emphasized a simple idea: transparency strengthens trust. That applies here. If you believe transparency matters — watch the full investigation, share it, and use #ReleaseTheLymeFiles
Conspiracies don’t begin with imagination. They begin when transparency ends.
CHAPTERS ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
0:00 The weapon that crawled, bit, and disappeared
NEW LYME VACCINE: How much vaccine BS (safe and effective) can we tolerate??
Carl Tuttle Hudson, NH, United States
May 17, 2026
—– Forwarded Message —– From: CARL TUTTLE <runagain@comcast.net> To: thart15@jh.edu <thart15@jh.edu> Cc: kremington@ktvn.com <kremington@ktvn.com>; producers@ktvn.com <producers@ktvn.com> Sent: Sunday, May 17, 2026 at 09:16:59 AM EDT Subject: Health Watch: Lyme disease vaccine
KTVN 2 News Nevada
Kristen Remington Anchor/Reporter
Health Watch: Lyme disease vaccine
Quote:
“There used to be a Lyme disease vaccine called LYMErix in the late 90’s and early 2000’s. This was eventually pulled off the market due to low sales.”-Thomas M. Hart, PhD
Thomas M. Hart, PhD
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
615 N. Wolfe Street, E5638
Baltimore Maryland 21205
Dr. Hart,
“Low sales” of the LYMErix vaccine is not the entire truth and has been regurgitated across mainstream media.
The vaccine known as LYMErix was supposed to expose the immune system to the outer surface protein A (OspA) of the spirochete responsible for causing Lyme disease but for some patients, it caused the same crippling effects of the disease itself as reported in the class action lawsuit:
“The people who have contacted us were, prior to vaccination with LYMErix, healthy, active and energetic. Indeed, the very reason they sought the LYMErix vaccine was their desire to preserve their healthy, active lifestyle. However, what they experienced was a dramatic degradation of their health and quality of life. As will be described below, these previously healthy individuals are now afflicted with painful, at times debilitating arthritic symptoms, including joint pain and swelling, as well as extremely severe Lyme-disease-like symptoms which have persisted to this day.”
Below is the link to the Final Judgement and Approval of the class action against SmithKline Beecham as a settlement was awarded to these individuals.
JUDGEMENT, FINAL ORDER AND DECREE GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL OF THE CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT:
A chronic relapsing seronegative disease does not fit the vaccine model so chronic Lyme which is completely devastating to the patient is not recognized and there is no treatment. The disabled Lyme patient is left to fend for himself because treating this class of patient became too expensive as outlined in the racketeering lawsuit. There is a growing community of horribly disabled patients whose disability has gone unrecognized for three decades.
Here’s yet another victim:
Nicole Malachowski: Unfit for Duty from Debilitating Tick-Borne Disease
“Her medical retirement, however, was premature. At only 43 years old, she was deemed unfit for duty due to neurological damage from tick-borne illness.”
The latest vaccine from French drug manufacturer Valneva is another OspA vaccine similar to LYMErix so the possibility exists that the class of patient who experienced the debilitating effects of LYMErix could end up with the same results. There was no attempt to uncover why LYMErix disabled the patient as described in the class action. Until we fully understand how Lyme disease disables its victim aren’t we playing Russian roulette with people’s health?
Respectfully Submitted,
Carl Tuttle
Independent Researcher
Hudson, NH
Suppressing evidence of persistent infection after antibiotic treatment for Lyme disease is not collaboration, it is collusion:
Peer Reviewed Evidence of Persistence of Lyme Disease Spirochete Borrelia burgdorferi and Tick-Borne Diseases (700 references)
Breaking: Federal Court Strikes Down Landmark Fluoride Ruling on Technicality — ‘Not the Science’
Citing a procedural question, a federal appeals court has vacated a landmark decision that found fluoridated drinking water poses an “unreasonable risk” to children’s health. The court sent the case back to the district judge and ordered him to ignore any scientific evidence uncovered after 2020. Attorney Michael Connett told The Defender the court instructed the judge “to travel back in time to 2020 and make this ruling based on a stale factual record.”
A federal appeals court has vacated a landmark decision that found fluoridated drinking water poses an “unreasonable risk” to children’s health under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA).
The decision by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals did not challenge the substance of the lower court’s findings — that fluoride is toxic to children and ought to be regulated. Instead, the court based its decision on procedural issues related to the lower court’s handling of the litigation.
The case will now go back to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, where District Judge Edward Chen will be required to exclude all scientific evidence that became available after 2020.
Michael Connett, attorney for the plaintiffs, told The Defender the court “instructed Judge Chen to travel back in time to 2020 and make this ruling based on a stale factual record.”
Connett said the directive to ignore years’ worth of evidence on fluoride’s dangers runs counter to the intent of the TSCA — which is to protect hundreds of millions of Americans from substances that are harmful to human health.
The federal appeals court ruling, handed down late Thursday, stemmed from a lawsuit against the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) brought by consumer advocacy groups including Food & Water Watch, the Fluoride Action Network (FAN), and Moms Against Fluoridation.
The groups sued after the EPA refused to consider their 2016 citizens’ petition asking the agency to regulate fluoride.
After two bench trials, Chen ruled that fluoride at the federally recommended concentration of 0.7 milligrams/liter (mg/L) posed an “unreasonable risk” to children’s health and ordered the EPA to regulate it accordingly.
However, the 9th Circuit panel said the lower court violated the “party presentation principle” — a legal doctrine requiring courts to act as neutral arbiters rather than taking control of a case’s factual development.
The ruling is a procedural victory for the EPA. However, since the trial drew national attention to the extensive evidence of fluoride’s neurotoxic effects, communities and states across the country have stopped adding fluoride to their water.
Even the EPA itself — under a different law — has launched a new investigation into the safety of water fluoridation. (See link for article)
Madison Area Lyme Support Group 