Today we announce revisions accomplished over the past few days with the assistance of AI.
Without this time-saving help, these revisions would have taken months. But we do not have months to spare as the world is dealing with an unprecedented uptick in cancers. Everyone needs this information now.
We will begin at the beginning, starting with our first 3-Supplement AI search on Cancer Risk that established the baseline. We will end with the 90 to 95 percent Optimal Cancer Risk Reduction Protocol, that we display above and once again, with analysis, at the conclusion. (See link for article)
________________
**Comment**
I learned something new. (Well, to be fair I’m always learning something new!)
I learned that it’s important to take enteric capsules of berberine, for the same reasons your proteolytic enzymes need to be enteric: to protect the supplement from stomach acid, allowing it to be dissolved in the intestines to enhance absorption and effectiveness. Berberine also outperformed Metformin.
Users in berberine clinical literature consistently report effects on energy metabolism and AMPK activation beginning to appear at the 6-8 weeks mark with consistent daily use. The most significant observations typically occur in the 6-12 week window.Source
Enter the Root6™ OTC Protocol:
Root6™ is nothing more than our basic four + Berberine and Sulforaphane. But because of synergy, the Cancer Risk Reduction is magnified, which is why cocktails of repurposed drugs work so well against cancer (very similar to how effectively they work against HIV compared with monotherapy).
COVID-19 mRNA vaccines direct host cells to manufacture prefusion-stabilized SARS-CoV-2 spike protein that retains its furin cleavage site and carries two proline substitutions (K986P/V987P) in S2 that are not present in wild-type SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. This review examines two distinct forms of mRNA vaccine shedding: (i) molecular transcriptional shedding, involving the production, proteolytic fragmentation, persistence, and dissemination of vaccine-derived molecular products within vaccinated individuals through cellular division, extracellular release, and vesicular transport; and (ii) human-to-human shedding, involving the potential transfer of these products from vaccinated individuals to other individuals through biological secretions. Evidence supporting internal molecular dissemination includes circulating spike protein, proteolytically released fragments, vaccine-derived mRNA, and spike-bearing extracellular vesicles capable of transporting molecular cargo beyond its original cellular source. Human studies document circulating S1 within 24 hours, spike-bearing exosomes by day 14, vaccine mRNA in plasma for up to 28 days, vaccine-derived spike peptides at 69–187 days, spike protein in monocytes at 852 days, circulating spike at 1,173 days, exosomal vaccine mRNA at 1,284 days, and spike protein alongside plasmid-associated DNA sequences in skin at 1,364 days. N1-methylpseudouridine-associated +1 ribosomal frameshifting generates unintended translation products, expanding the repertoire of molecules potentially available for extracellular release. The proposed internal dissemination model incorporates two additional pathways: mitotic inheritance, whereby daughter cells may inherit an altered proteome following cellular division, and exosome-mediated communication, whereby molecular cargo may affect cells that never directly received vaccine mRNA. Experimental studies demonstrate spike-mediated interference with five interconnected molecular systems—coagulation, receptor–renin–angiotensin signaling, innate immune sensing, tumor-suppressor transcription, and vesicular interferon signaling. Together, these findings identify multiple pathways through which persistent vaccine-derived molecular products could disrupt cellular regulation, propagate abnormal signaling between cells, and potentially sustain downstream biological disturbances. Regarding human-to-human shedding, vaccine-derived mRNA has been detected in trace, fragmented form within breast-milk extracellular vesicles, establishing its presence in a biological secretion transferred between individuals. Extracellular vesicles are also present in saliva, exhaled breath, sweat, semen, and other bodily secretions. Their capacity to protect molecular cargo, survive biological barriers, enter recipient cells, and deliver functional mRNA provides a biologically plausible pathway for wider interpersonal transfer. An observational study further reported associations between proximity to vaccinated individuals and menstrual irregularities among unvaccinated women. However, no published study has directly demonstrated transfer of vaccine-derived spike protein, mRNA, or plasmid-associated DNA between individuals through respiratory emissions, saliva, sweat, or other non-milk secretions, leaving a critical evidence gap concerning the extent and biological consequences of human-to-human shedding. Collectively, these findings support intracellular and intercellular dissemination of vaccine-derived molecular products, with evidence of persistence extending over multiple years. The convergence of proteolytic fragmentation, vesicular transport, and potential mitotic inheritance suggests mechanisms through which molecular products and their downstream signaling effects could extend beyond the original cells of production. Direct experimental studies are needed to establish the functional consequences of long-term persistence, determine whether these pathways sustain molecular disturbances across cellular generations, and establish whether biologically significant human-to-human transfer occurs through additional bodily secretions and, if so, its extent.
The GRANITE Act, H.R. 10174, would stop foreign governments from censoring Americans on American soil. Rep. Michael Rulli of Ohio introduced it on August 27. Lawyer Preston Byrne designed it. Then it sat. On October 15, according to the official record at Congress.gov, Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky added his name. He is still the only one.
GRANITE matters to every American who posts online. Britain, Russia, Australia and Azerbaijan are already reaching across the water.
Massie leaves Congress on January 3. The work now is to add names, so the bill is ready when it is reintroduced.
You can tell your Representative and both Senators in two minutes. The form and a copy-ready message are here. Source
A 2010 plan to watch mothers who asked questions about vaccines. A 2012 forward to Jeffrey Epstein asking for his idea about those mothers. A label that followed me for a decade. All of it is in the record now.
Picture a mother at a kitchen table in 2010. Her son has a fever after his shots, and she types a question into a search box: Is this normal?
That same year, in a report commissioned by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, consultants proposed a system to catch her question. They called it a “vaccine rumor surveillance system.” It appears on page 17. On the same page, the same report concedes “real and suspected adverse events following immunization.”
Real. Their word. The question the mother asked was legitimate, and they knew it. The system was for her anyway.
I know this because the report is in the Epstein files.
She was not the first
The mother at that table in 2010 had a long line of women behind her.
In the 1950s and 60s, the leading theory of autism blamed the mother. “Refrigerator mothers,” the experts called them: cold women who had frozen their children into silence. It took decades to retire that idea, and no one apologized for it.
Their daughters became the mothers of the 1990s and 2000s who watched a talking, laughing child go quiet after a round of shots, said so, and were told they had imagined the child they remembered. They were called hysterical, then anti-science, then dangerous. The one thing they were almost never called was witnesses.
The system they reported to was built not to hear them. In 1986, Congress shielded vaccine makers from most lawsuits and created a no-fault compensation program in their place; in 2011 the Supreme Court confirmed that the courthouse door stays shut. The program’s own reporting system, VAERS, is voluntary, and a federally funded Harvard study in 2010 found it captures fewer than one percent of adverse events. In 2008 the government quietly conceded one child’s case, Hannah Poling’s, agreeing that vaccines had aggravated an underlying disorder and produced “features of autism.” The next year, in a single omnibus proceeding, it turned away roughly five thousand families at once.
So when a mother said, “I saw my child regress,” here is what she had: no lawsuit, a reporting system that recorded almost nothing, a compensation program that had admitted one case and shut the door on thousands, and a public conversation that treated her memory as misinformation.
That is the history on page 17 of the Gates Foundation’s 2010 report. Its authors conceded that some adverse events after immunization are “real.” They proposed watching the mothers anyway. (See link for article)
________________
**Comment**
The ‘vaccine’ injured have faced the same persecution as those in Lymeland. The system it is all built upon was never created to truly help patients, which are gaslit, blamed, and harassed.
Important excerpt:
And on July 9, 2017, he [Epstein] wrote to Bill Gates proposing that philanthropists be “orgazanized to decide a shadow governmental grants structure.”
Ji points out that a ‘shadow governmental grants structure’ decides which research is funded, which health programs run and where, and which questions count as science and which count as misinformation.This shadow group usurps governmental decisions made in public, under oath, and subject to a vote.
It’s quite easy to see how Lymeland and ‘vaccines‘ have remained in their current state for decades, and it completely explains COVID madness. The structure remains in place, primed and ready for the next fiasco created by these ‘philanthropists’ that are ‘organized to decide a shadow governmental grants structure.’ Government is captured, science is captured, media is captured, mainstream medicine and professional organizations are captured, and so many remain clueless to this takeover.
Another important excerpt:
Go to justice.gov/epstein. Type EFTA00702570. Read the note about “Mother’s Army.” Then type EFTA01041100 and read the word “shadow” in Epstein’s own hand. Then decide who was spreading rumors.
If you want to go further, I made a free guide: Start Here: 12 Documents in the Epstein Files, and How to Read Them. Each entry has the original page, what it shows, what it doesn’t prove, and a link to check it yourself.
New US Customs Rules Threaten Your Access to Natural Health
By The ANH Team
10/15/2026
Stronger border checks for personal imports can protect Americans from unsafe foreign products, but the same rules could also shrink consumer access and choice. Action Alert!
THE TOPLINE
New customs requirements could mean higher prices, delayed deliveries, and fewer natural health choices for consumers buying products from overseas.
Stronger scrutiny can protect consumers from unsafe products, but added costs and paperwork could also drive responsible small suppliers out of the U.S. market.
We support practical, risk-based import procedures that target illegal products while preserving access to compliant products from reputable companies.
Consumers who buy natural health products from overseas could soon face higher prices, delayed deliveries, and fewer choices. A new Customs and Border Protection (CBP) rule that comes into force on October 22, 2026 adds hurdles that may discourage smaller companies from supplying American customers. Our concern is that responsible businesses could be caught alongside sellers of unsafe or illegal products. Additionally, patients who import life-saving medications for personal use that are not currently manufactured in the US may find there are delays or even barriers at US borders which could endanger lives.
What’s Changing
Low-value packages (under $800) imported for personal use previously benefited from a customs exemption that simplified their entry into the United States. The new CBP rule removes that exemption for international mail and adds stricter requirements for mailed products overseen by agencies such as FDA.
CBP offers an electronic option for some shipments, but it still requires detailed information, someone legally responsible for the import, and a financial guarantee called a customs bond. Suppliers may need specialist help, adding costs that consumers could ultimately pay.
The rule does not itself ban all imported medicines or abolish FDA’s personal importation policy. But administrative barriers can make an established supply route unusable. (See link for article)
Open Letter Regarding the Removal of the mRNA Platform
Addressed to Secretary Kennedy and President Trump by Americans for Health Freedom and the listed signatories.
An open letter demanding that President Donald Trump and Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. remove mRNA vaccines from the market has surpassed 3,300 signatures, according to Dr. Mary Talley Bowden.
Today, Dr. Bowden confirmed to JonFleetwood.com that the letter had collected 3,397 signatures as of her latest count.
The signatories reportedly have a combined social media following of more than 66 million.
Published September 18 by Americans for Health Freedom, the letter challenges the Trump administration over its failure to deliver on a central demand of the Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) movement: removing mRNA products from the market.
Doctors, scientists, legislators, and other public officials have signed a letter calling for greater transparency, independent investigation, and accountability over unresolved questions surrounding COVID-19 vaccine safety and efficacy.
Do not worry if you aren’t a doctor, researcher, or PhD – sign it anyway.
The dangerous mRNA platform concerns everyone and should include everyone’s input. Future generations depend upon our action. It should concern us greatly that within 72 hours of a Siberian lab worker dying without a plague diagnosis, vaccine stocks shot up 20%, proving a fear narrative and countermeasure economy are fully built and waiting to be set in motion at any time by an unresolved death, long before any evidence.
The CDC literally changed the definition of vaccine so that mRNA fit the category. Comparing old and new versions of what they posted on their website, here was the definition on the CDC website in 2020:
Vaccines contain the same germs that cause disease . . . But they have been killed or weakened to the point that they don’t make you sick.
The new version became much more general, to include mRNA. Here is the current definition on the CDC website:
A preparation that is used to stimulate the body’s immune response against diseases.
Many points stated are inaccurate at best. For instance, many become ill after vaccination. In fact, many become ill with the actual disease they are vaccinating for.
Using the genetic code of COVID, a mRNA strand is constructed to create a specific protein
Gene therapy doesn’t work for long, requiring multiple doses and perfect conditions in the body
Never before have human cells been hijacked to create something that is supposed to attack the body
Overnight this technology used on a minority with particular deficiencies, was used on everyone to combat a virus
This gene therapy acts as a Trojan Horse by moving into cells to create a portion of the virus known as the spike protein
This important article explains that this Trojan Horse does NOT actually contain mRNA which is short-lived, but rather modified RNA (“modRNA”) which is developed for longevity which will disrupt and block cell metabolism and be incorporated into the human genome
It is asinine to expect the mRNA platform to work like a traditional vaccine
The ‘powers that be’ knew the shots wouldn’t give you lasting immunity and probably wouldn’t work on variants.
They had no idea of side effects as it has never been used to create an antigen.
Founded in 2010, Moderna never talked about vaccines – only therapeutics and they never made any money at all.
High-ranking officials in the FDA and CDC have financial conflicts of interests with Moderna and Pfizer.
It’s called a “platform” for drug delivery because new drugs are needed for variants, creating a endless market.
COVID was used to get the public used to mRNA due to the conflicts of interests they have with a myriad of other drugs that are now in the pipeline.
It’s a win-win for profits for Big Pharma as well as the Biosecurity state allowing for the ability to track people’s movements through “vaccination” cards. It’s also a win for power-brokers like Gates, the Davos crowd, WEF, WHO, and corrupt politicians desiring a mechanism to gain greater biological control over the population, and to be able to give or take away rights on command, naturally leading to eugenics.
