Old Molecule, New Evidence: Chlorine Dioxide Shows Promise in 3 Veterinary Cases

July 21, 2026

https://imahealth.substack.com/p/old-molecule-new-evidence-chlorine?

Old Molecule, New Evidence: Chlorine Dioxide Shows Promise in Three Veterinary Cases

Three animals with limited options improved after treatment with chlorine dioxide. A new case series in the Journal of Independent Medicine documents what happened.

Independent Medical Alliance

May 27, 2026

The FDA calls chlorine dioxide “a dangerous bleach.” Millions of people drink low doses of it every day in treated tap water. And clinicians and veterinarians have been quietly using it for years to treat conditions that conventional medicine couldn’t resolve.

A new case series in the Journal of Independent Medicine puts clinical outcomes on the record for the first time in veterinary medicine.

Teresa Carr, a veterinarian with 30 years of clinical experience, and Mitchell Liester, MD, an adjoint assistant professor in the Department of Psychiatry at the University of Colorado School of Medicine, documented what happened when they used chlorine dioxide protocols on three animals that had run out of conventional options. A dog with suspected liver cancer. A cat with an infection that wouldn’t respond to antibiotics. A dog with a large, painful mammary tumor. All three improved.

“I began independently researching alternative therapies for patients with more complex conditions.” — Teresa Carr

📖 Read and Download the Full Paper

Chlorine Dioxide as an Adjunctive Treatment in Three Veterinary Cases: A Case Series (JIM Vol. 2, No. 3, 2026) — Authors: Teresa Carr and Mitchell Liester

What Chlorine Dioxide Is

Chlorine dioxide is a selective oxidant first synthesized in 1811. This is not the stuff you accidentally gulped at the swimming pool as a kid. It is a distinct molecule with a different mechanism of action: it selectively oxidizes specific amino acids in microbial proteins, disrupting their function and replication. That gives it broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity against bacteria, viruses, fungi, and parasites.

“Chlorine dioxide was synthesized over 200 years ago, but was primarily used as a water treatment agent. It also has broad spectrum antimicrobial activity against bacteria, viruses, fungi, and parasites.” — Mitchell Liester

Regulatory agencies have approved it for water treatment, food safety, and medical equipment sterilization. The antimicrobial properties are not in dispute. What’s been missing is formal clinical investigation.

The human data that does exist is promising. Studies have documented improved glucose control, reduced inflammation, enhanced wound healing, and activity against antibiotic-resistant pathogens. A case series showed complete resolution of treatment-refractory diabetic foot ulcers, with one patient achieving sustained medication-free glycemic control for three years.

The Safety Question

The FDA labeled chlorine dioxide “a dangerous bleach” during the COVID pandemic and pursued criminal enforcement against people promoting its use. Carr and Liester argue that label was based on high-dose misuse, not on the low-dose therapeutic protocols practitioners are actually using.

“The FDA during the COVID pandemic labeled chlorine dioxide a dangerous bleach. Now, this was based on very high doses being misused, not on the low doses that have been demonstrated to be safe.” — Mitchell Liester

The safety data at low doses tells a different story:

  • The EPA established a no-observed-adverse-effect level of 3 mg/kg/day for oral chlorine dioxide
  • Phase I and II clinical trials for ALS confirmed that IV sodium chlorite at doses up to 3.2 mg/kg/day was safe and well-tolerated, with no serious adverse events
  • Millions of people consume low-dose chlorine dioxide daily in municipal drinking water
  • In these three veterinary cases, no adverse effects across enema, oral, and intratumoral routes over treatment periods ranging from 10 days to 8 months

Calling this compound “a dangerous bleach” while millions drink it daily is, as the authors put it, like labeling chemotherapy a poison based solely on high-dose toxicity.

Why the Evidence Stays Thin

If the safety data is there and practitioners are already using it, why does the evidence base remain so limited?

The answer is structural. Chlorine dioxide cannot be patented. That means no pharmaceutical company has a financial incentive to fund the controlled trials that regulators require for approval. Regulators prohibit its therapeutic use because those trials don’t exist. And the prohibition makes it harder for researchers to generate the data that would justify lifting it.

“This compound is not patentable, and therefore it’s unlikely that pharmaceutical companies will want to fund further research.” — Mitchell Liester

(See top link for article and video)

________________

For more:

Category:

Lyme, Malaria, research, Treatment

Comments Off on Old Molecule, New Evidence: Chlorine Dioxide Shows Promise in 3 Veterinary Cases

Graphene: The Wonder Material They’re Deploying Inside You

https://falkentheater.substack.com/p/graphene-the-wonder-material-theyre?

GRAPHENE: THE WONDER MATERIAL THEY’RE DEPLOYING INSIDE YOU

THE BRAIN IS THE BATTLEFIELD — Article Series : Article 1 of 7

Falken

Mar 07, 2026

What Is Graphene – The 'Wonder Material' Changing Technology but is it harmful? – Waatea News: Māori Radio Station

THE BRAIN IS THE BATTLEFIELD — Article Series : Article 1 of 7

Published as part of the investigative series synthesizing the documented research dossier ‘Homo Chimericus’ (January 2024) — cross-referenced with peer-reviewed literature, EU Commission records, and publicly available institutional documentation.

INTRODUCTION: The Story You Were Told

The story most people know goes like this: graphene is a revolutionary material — a single layer of carbon atoms arranged in a hexagonal lattice, first isolated in 2004 at the University of Manchester by Andre Geim and Konstantin Novoselov, who promptly won the 2010 Nobel Prize in Physics for their work. It is the thinnest material ever discovered, yet stronger than steel. It conducts electricity and heat with extraordinary efficiency. It is transparent, flexible, and in theory endlessly useful.

That story is true. But it is also, profoundly and deliberately, incomplete.

What the popular narrative carefully omits is the second, parallel chapter of graphene’s development: the massive, multi-billion-euro program to develop graphene specifically as a biological interface material — to introduce it into the human body, embed it in living tissue, and use it as the foundational substrate of a digital-biological control architecture.

This first article of the series examines graphene’s material properties with precision — not to celebrate them, but to explain exactly why this material was selected for this specific purpose, and what it actually does once it is inside you.

PART 1: What Graphene Actually Is — The Science

The Carbon Lattice

Graphene is a two-dimensional allotrope of carbon — a single layer of carbon atoms arranged in a repeating hexagonal pattern, sometimes described as molecular ‘chicken-wire’. At one atom thick, it occupies essentially no physical space in the third dimension. It is the flattest material in existence.

From this minimal structure emerge extraordinary physical properties. Graphene’s electron mobility — the ease with which electrical charge moves through it — reaches approximately 200,000 cm²/V·s at room temperature, far exceeding copper or silicon. Its thermal conductivity reaches 5,000 W/m·K — more than ten times that of copper. Its tensile strength is approximately 130 GPa, making it roughly 200 times stronger than structural steel.

These properties, separately, would already be remarkable. Together, in a material that is biocompatible, flexible, and manufacturable, they become transformative — and, in the wrong hands, something more concerning.

The Graphene Family

Research institutions working on biological graphene deployment draw on a family of related materials, each with distinct properties:

  • Graphene Oxide (GO) — graphene chemically modified with oxygen functional groups. Water-dispersible, and therefore injectable in aqueous solutions. Extensively documented in biomedical delivery research.
  • Reduced Graphene Oxide (rGO) — GO with most oxygen groups removed. More electrically conductive. Used in neural electrode and biosensor applications.
  • Carbon Nanotubes (CNTs) — rolled graphene sheets forming cylindrical structures. Extraordinary tensile strength and electrical conductivity. Can penetrate cell membranes.
  • Graphene Quantum Dots (GQDs) — graphene fragments at nanoscale (sub-10 nm). Highly fluorescent, demonstrably taken up by neurons, and capable of crossing the blood-brain barrier.
  • Graphene Nanoribbons (GNRs) — narrow strips of graphene specifically used as plasmonic nano-antennas resonating in the Terahertz frequency band — the exact band designated for 6G wireless communications.

◆ KEY TECHNICAL POINT:

A graphene nanoribbon of 1 micrometer length and 10–100 nanometer width functions as a plasmonic antenna resonating in the Terahertz band (0.1–10 THz). This is not incidental. It is the structural backbone connecting graphene-based biological materials to 6G telecommunications infrastructure — a convergence explored in depth in Article 2.

PART 2: Graphene in Biological Systems

Blood-Brain Barrier Penetration

The blood-brain barrier (BBB) is among the body’s most critical protective filters — a specialized network of endothelial cells that tightly regulates what can pass from the bloodstream into the brain. Most pharmaceutical drugs cannot cross it. Graphene quantum dots, in specific size ranges, can — a fact documented in peer-reviewed animal studies and multiple review papers in journals including ACS Nano and Nature Nanotechnology.

Once inside the brain, graphene materials interact directly with neurons. Research published in Nature Communications documented that graphene substrates in contact with neurons modulate synaptic transmission — altering the frequency and amplitude of neural firing. The mechanism involves graphene’s ability to alter the potassium ion environment at the neuron-material interface, which directly governs electrochemical signaling. (See link for article)

________________

**Comment**

This website has posted material on graphene due to the fact a group of scientists and researchers sued the FDA under a FOIA to force the release of hundreds of thousands of documents related to the licensing of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID shot. This forced the FDA to reveal the Pfizer COVID shots contain graphene and multiple researchers have shown they are in fact 99% graphene. The article points out that it is also in the following items: ( I highly recommend covidproject which has shown graphene in various applications, including micro-tech in all types of injectables via dark field microscopy)

If graphene is accumulating in the body due to multiple exposure over years, the threshold for achieving functional nano-network density in tissue is lower than a single, identifiable event.

According to Dr. Bryan Ardis, both bee pollen (glucose oxidase, GOD) and apple pectin draw both graphene and aluminum out of the body.

For more:

Category:

Activism, vaccines

Comments Off on Graphene: The Wonder Material They’re Deploying Inside You

Vaccines NOT Tested Against True Inert Placebo: All 3 Vaccine Technologies Are Fundamentally Unsafe

https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/dr-pierre-kory-it-is-a-myth-that?

Dr. Pierre Kory: “It is a Myth That Vaccines Are Safe and Necessary…If I Had Young Children Today, They Would Not Receive a Single Vaccine.”

“…97% of SIDS deaths occur within 7 days of vaccination.”

Lioness of Judah Ministry

Jul 21, 2026

Source: Dr. Dawn Michael

Dr. Pierre Kory, MD: “It is a myth that vaccines are safe and necessary.”

“If I had young children today, they would not receive a single vaccine.” Dr. Kory explains that Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) peaks at 2, 4, and 6 months of age — exactly when infants receive multiple routine vaccinations.

He states that the government refuses to perform true placebo-controlled safety trials on vaccines. Unlike other pharmaceuticals, which undergo 2–6 years of rigorous safety testing before FDA/CDC approval, vaccines have never been subjected to the same long-term, robust safety standards.

In clinical trials, safety monitoring for adverse reactions was extremely short:

Hepatitis B vaccine: Tested on only 147 infants/children and monitored for just 5 days before approval.

Hepatitis A vaccine: Monitored for 14 days.

Meningococcal (meningitis) vaccine: Monitored for 7 days.

Prevnar (pneumococcal) vaccine: Monitored for 7 days.

MMR vaccine: Followed for 42 days.

RSV vaccine: Monitored for 30 days.

DTaP / Tdap vaccines: Monitored for 14 days.

Gardasil (HPV) vaccine: Monitored for 14 days.

Crucially, no childhood vaccine has ever been tested against a true inert saline placebo. Trial “placebos” have instead used aluminum adjuvants or other vaccines:

Gardasil trial → placebo was Hepatitis A vaccine + aluminum adjuvant

Hepatitis A trial → placebo was Hepatitis B vaccine

Influenza trial → placebo was the other flu strain vaccine

Meningitis trial → placebo was DTaP

Pertussis trial → placebo was Tetanus + Diphtheria

Polio trial → placebo was diluted polio vaccine

Vaxelis (6-in-1) trial → placebo was DTaP + Polio + Hib + Hep B

Hepatitis B trial → placebo was aluminum adjuvant alone

Dr. Kory notes that countries with the most vaccines on their infant schedules have the highest infant mortality rates.

The United States gives more infant vaccines than any other industrialized nation — and has the highest infant mortality rate among them.

He further states that 97% of SIDS deaths occur within 7 days of vaccination.

(Click on top link for video with Dr. Kory)

_________________

https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/urgent-warning-from-bret-weinstein

URGENT WARNING from Bret Weinstein: ALL 3 Vaccine Technologies Are Fundamentally UNSAFE. NONE Are Safe.

The era of “safe and effective” blanket claims is over. Every vaccine technology has built-in mechanisms that harm you.

Lioness of Judah Ministry

Jul 15, 2026

Source: Valerie Anne Smith

Bret Weinstein: Every single vaccine carries severe, built-in dangers:

  1. Live Attenuated Vaccines: They can cause long-term immune compromise. Your body’s natural defenses get damaged over time.
  2. Inactivated Vaccines: They leave lingering toxins behind in your system. These don’t just disappear.
  3. mRNA Vaccines: Your own cells are turned into factories that keep producing spike protein — with all its toxic effects — long after the shot.

Weinstein’s direct conclusion: “None are fundamentally safe. They all have severe downsides.”

This isn’t theory.

This is the reality of how these technologies actually work inside the human body.

The era of “safe and effective” blanket claims is over.

Every vaccine technology has built-in mechanisms that harm you. Do your own research. Protect yourself and your family.

(Click on top link for video with Dr. Weinstein)

For more:

Category:

Activism, research, vaccines

Comments Off on Vaccines NOT Tested Against True Inert Placebo: All 3 Vaccine Technologies Are Fundamentally Unsafe

The Secret History of Lyme Disease the US Government Doesn’t Want You to Know

The secret history of Lyme disease the US government doesn’t want you to know | Unreported

Jun 17, 2026 Unreported with Meagan Medick

Nearly half a million Americans are diagnosed with Lyme disease every year, and ER tick bite visits are hitting the highest levels since 2017. So why does it feel like nobody is sounding the alarm? And why is Congress now ordering a federal watchdog to dig through decades of classified Cold War military records searching for answers?

In this episode of “Unreported,” Meagan Medick sits down with author Kris Newby, who wrote “Bitten: The Secret History of Lyme Disease and Biological Weapons” and is a senior producer on the Oscar semi-finalist documentary “Under Our Skin.” Together, they examine documented evidence that the U.S. government experimented on ticks as potential Cold War bioweapons, the whistleblower testimony of the scientist who discovered Lyme disease and why a mystery organism he identified in the original ticks was quietly removed from his discovery paper.

They also dig into the Lone Star tick experiments that may have seeded the Northeast with nonnative species, the rise of meat allergies and why a new Lyme vaccine is already raising red flags. Plus: what the Cold War records investigation in Congress could uncover and who controls what gets released.

For more:

Category:

Activism, Lyme, Ticks, Transmission

Comments Off on The Secret History of Lyme Disease the US Government Doesn’t Want You to Know

Batch-Dependent Safety Signal: Nationwide Analysis of Suspected Adverse Events After COVID Shot in Germany

July 14, 2026

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/09246479261453789

Batch-dependent safety signal: Nationwide analysis of suspected adverse events following COVID-19 vaccination in Germany

Vibeke Manniche vibeke@vibekemanniche.dk, Vít Karásek https://orcid.org/0009-0007-1638-2778, […], and Peter Riis Hansen https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9056-535X+3View all authors and affiliations

Abstract
Background

Preliminary reports have suggested a batch-dependent safety signal for COVID-19 vaccines. It is important to establish if these findings can be replicated.

Methods

We used publicly available nationwide data from Germany spanning the first 3.5 years of the vaccination campaign to calculate weekly rates of spontaneously reported suspected adverse events (SAEs) per 1000 administered vaccine doses.

Results

SAE rates ranged between 2.2 and 22.8 per 1000 doses and women accounted for 72% of all SAEs. Crucially, SAE rates for Comirnaty (Pfizer-BioNTech), Spikevax (Moderna), and Vaxzevria (AstraZeneca) were very high in the initial phase of vaccination rollout and hereafter declined precipitously. For example, SAE rates in weeks 1–4 of 2021 were 8.2, 50.8, and 620.9 per 1000 doses of Comirnaty, Spikevax, and Vaxzevria, respectively, but fell to 4.4, 11.6, and 7.4 per 1000 doses in weeks 12–16 of 2021.

Conclusions

SAE rates in Germany were highly elevated in the initial phase of COVID-19 vaccination rollout and then fell precipitously, a pattern compatible with a batch-dependent safety signal. Furthermore, there was a considerable overrepresentation of women with SAEs. These preliminary results call for more definitive studies of batch-dependent COVID-19 vaccine safety

Category:

research, vaccines, Viruses

Comments Off on Batch-Dependent Safety Signal: Nationwide Analysis of Suspected Adverse Events After COVID Shot in Germany